|
|
|
August 2008 Elite Cow Statistics
|
Determination of elite or high-ranking grade status was based on a
two-stage screening procedure. The first-stage screening criteria for
eligibility were:
- Management groups included lactations of at least three other cows
when averaged across a cow's lactations.
- Last calving was within 2 years and 3 months of current evaluation date.
- Last record was either in progress (code R) or had a termination
code of 0 (blank), 1, 2, or 8.
- First lactation was not predominantly owner-sampler type of
test.
- Reliability of milk evaluation was at least 30%.
Summary information for eligible (those passing first-stage screening)
registered cows are in Table 1.
|
Table 1. Mean predicted transmitting abilities
(PTAs) for milk, fat, protein, productive life (PL), somatic cell score (SCS),
and net merit (NM) for registered1 cows passing first-stage screening.
| 8,080 |
43 |
60 |
2.9 |
2.0 |
2.98 |
0.7 |
0.77 |
| 20,029 |
92 |
184 |
7.2 |
6.2 |
2.99 |
1.4 |
-0.42 |
| 6,095 |
60 |
145 |
8.9 |
3.6 |
3.00 |
0.6 |
-0.39 |
| 580,757 |
126 |
259 |
11.5 |
8.1 |
2.97 |
1.0 |
-1.43 |
| 151,722 |
102 |
235 |
13.2 |
7.8 |
2.99 |
1.0 |
-0.28 |
| 3,791 |
101 |
331 |
14.9 |
10.2 |
3.01 |
0.7 |
1.23 |
| 1,713 |
21 |
-299 |
-1.2 |
-6.2 |
2.99 |
0.9 |
4.37 |
1Includes cows in an identity enrollment program for some breeds.
|
|
Table 2.
Standard deviations of PTAs for milk, fat, protein, PL, SCS, and NM for registered1
cows passing first-stage screening.
| 8,080 |
+/- 107 |
+/- 430 |
+/- 15 |
+/- 12 |
+/- 0.12 |
+/- 1.3 |
+/- 7.3 |
| 20,029 |
+/- 140 |
+/- 510 |
+/- 19 |
+/- 15 |
+/- 0.11 |
+/- 2 |
+/- 9.4 |
| 6,095 |
+/- 127 |
+/- 521 |
+/- 19 |
+/- 14 |
+/- 0.13 |
+/- 1.8 |
+/- 9.9 |
| 580,757 |
+/- 143 |
+/- 663 |
+/- 22 |
+/- 18 |
+/- 0.13 |
+/- 1.5 |
+/- 9.7 |
| 151,722 |
+/- 131 |
+/- 599 |
+/- 22 |
+/- 18 |
+/- 0.11 |
+/- 1.3 |
+/- 7.4 |
| 3,791 |
+/- 126 |
+/- 521 |
+/- 20 |
+/- 15 |
+/- 0.12 |
+/- 1.4 |
+/- 6 |
| 1,713 |
+/- 131 |
+/- 654 |
+/- 23 |
+/- 17 |
+/- 0.12 |
+/- 1.3 |
+/- 9.7 |
1Includes cows in an identity enrollment program for some breeds.
|
For registered eligible cows, a percentile table for each breed was
constructed based on NM. Those percentile tables are provided with USDA-DHIA
evaluations for active artificial-insemination bulls. A percentile was assigned for each cow with
data distributed in format 105. Although the data for Red and White cows are
combined with those for Holstein cows for genetic evaluations, a separate
percentile was used for screening Red and White cows
for elite or high-ranking grade status. The second-stage screening criterion was the
NM corresponding to a specified minimum percentile (Table 3).
|
Table 3.
Percentiles and corresponding NM for a cow to be designated as elite or a high-ranking grade and numbers by breed.
| 98 |
268 |
158 |
621 |
| 98 |
374 |
397 |
706 |
| 98 |
330 |
120 |
263 |
| 99 |
490 |
5,800 |
5,117 |
| 99 |
386 |
1,514 |
1,853 |
| 97 |
342 |
110 |
296 |
| 97 |
256 |
488 |
87 |
|
|