|
1
|
- H. DUANE NORMAN, E. HARE, and J.R. WRIGHT
- Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory
- Agricultural Research Service, USDA
- Beltsville, MD 20705-2350
- dnorman@aipl.arsusda.gov 301-504-8334
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Natural control vs. Human control
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Producers have largely emphasized milk and component yields and type
traits
- We could have selected for sustained production using more fitness
traits (had more of the traits been recorded)
|
|
9
|
- “Has rate of maturity changed over
time? How has it affected
- survival?”
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Management style
- (Hansen et al., 1998; Washburn et al., 2002; White et al., 2002)
|
|
12
|
- Expanding herds (Weigel et al., 2003)
- Type traits (Caraviello et al., 2003, 2004)
- Bulk milk SCC (Barkema et al., 1998)
- SCS (Samore et al., 2003)
- Crossbreeding (Weigel and Barlass, 2003)
- Theoretical analysis (Hill, 1980)
- Economic evaluation (Korver and Remkena, 1979)
|
|
13
|
- True longevity =
- how long cows actually stay in the herd
|
|
14
|
- Two phases:
- Nonproductive = Birth to first calving
- Productive = First calving to disposal
|
|
15
|
- Culling dates needed for all animals
- Genetic evaluation
- First US national evaluation in 1994
- First international Holstein bull rankings for longevity in November
2004
- Indirect response from correlated traits
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Fewer replacement heifers needed to maintain herd size
- Higher yield near maturity
- Replacement heifers are better genetically
- Higher proportion of cows in more profitable lactations
|
|
18
|
- Big impact on voluntary culling
- Reproductive and udder problems most likely contributors
- Risk factors (dystocia, displaced abomasum, mastitis)
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- Examine survival rates over time
- Document how long cows remain in the herd
- Examine when in the lactation cows are culled
- Examine why cows are culled
- Assess the impact of culling
|
|
21
|
- Herds participating in DHI testing for 1 yr prior to first calving and
remaining on test throughout the cow’s lactations
- Cows first calving 1980 to 1994 and remaining in same herd
- Cows culled for dairy purposes excluded
- No missing lactations (required 270–650 d between lactations)
|
|
22
|
- Subgroups created based on opportunity of each cow to calve at each
lactation
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Defined as fraction of cows that had the opportunity to calve again that
did
- Survival to parity 1 assumed to be 100% as no information was available
for heifers
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Additional measure of survival
- Sum of mean survival rates for parities 1 through 8 transformed to an
overall indicator of number of parities (calvings)
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
-
Cows (no.)
- 51– 101– 201–
501– 1001– 2001–
- Year 5–50 100 200 500 1000 2000 5000
- 1985 3.05 3.02 2.99 3.03 3.02 2.87 2.82
- 1987 2.95 2.94 2.92 2.95 2.96 2.86 2.60 1989 2.85 2.85 2.85 2.92 2.88 2.83 2.73
- 1991 2.83 2.82 2.82 2.85 2.89 2.80 2.68
- 1993 2.82 2.79 2.77 2.80 2.89 2.81 2.76
- 1994 2.83 2.80 2.75 2.79 2.83 2.79 2.74
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
- Mid- Mid- Mtn.- North- North- South- South-
- Year east west Prairie east west east west
- 1980 3.24 3.09 3.03 3.43 3.23 3.14 3.22
- 1982 3.16 2.99 2.96 3.32 3.11 3.13 3.17
- 1984 3.03 2.91 2.95 3.23 3.04 3.01 3.14
- 1986 2.97 2.83 2.89 3.14 2.99 2.89 3.03
- 1988 2.90 2.74 2.81 3.06 2.91 2.82 2.97
- 1990 2.88 2.73 2.78 3.02 2.90 2.74 2.91
- 1992 2.80 2.71 2.78 2.95 2.83 2.67 2.90
- 1994 2.74 2.70 2.74 2.92 2.84 2.59 2.89
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
|