Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Genetic Evaluations for
Mixed Breed Populations
2
Goals
  • Evaluate crossbred animals without biasing purebred evaluations
  • Accurately estimate breed differences
  • Compute national evaluations and examine changes
    • PTA’s of purebreds and crossbreds
    • Changes in reliability
  • Display results without confusion
3
Methods
  • All-breed animal model
    • Purebreds and crossbreds together
    • Unknown parents grouped by breed
    • Variance adjustments by breed
    • Age adjust to 36 months, not mature
    • 1988 software, good convergence
  • Within-breed-of-sire model examined but not used
4
Unknown Parent Groups
  • Groups formed based on
    • Birth year (flexible)
    • Breed (must have >10,000 cows)
    • Path (dams of cows, sires of cows, parents of bulls)
    • Origin (domestic vs other countries)
  • Paths have >1000 in last 15 years
  • Groups each have >500 animals
5
Data
  • Numbers of cows of all breeds
    • 22.6 million for milk and fat
    • 16.1 million for protein
    • 22.5 million for productive life
    • 19.9 million for daughter pregnancy rate
    • 10.5 million for somatic cell score
  • Type evaluated in separate breed files
  • Calving ease joint HO, BS, and HO x BS
  • Goats in all-breed model since 1988
6
Crossbred Cows
with 1st parity records
7
Recent Sires of Crossbred Cows
Sires born since 1997
8
Reliability
  • Crossbred cows
    • Will have PTAs, most did not before
    • Accurate PTAs from both parents
  • Purebred animals
    • Information from crossbred relatives
    • More contemporaries

9
All- vs Within-Breed Evaluations
Correlations of PTA Milk
10
Display of PTAs
  • Genetic base
    • Convert all-breed base back to within-breed-of-sire bases
    • Each animal gets just one PTA
    • PTAbrd = (PTAall – meanbrd) SDbrd/SDall
  • Heterosis and inbreeding
    • Both effects removed in the animal model
    • Heterosis added to crossbred animal PTA
    • Expected Future Inbreeding (EFI) and merit differ with mate breed
11
Genetic Standard Deviation Ratios
12
Schedule
  • Interbull test run Sept. 1, 2006
    • Trend validation
    • Convert all-breed PTA back to within-breed bases
  • Scientific publication (JDS)
  • Implementation
    • Expected February 2007
13
Conclusions
  • All breed model accounts for:
    • General heterosis
    • Unknown parent groups by breed
    • Heterogeneous variance by breed
  • PTA converted back to within breed bases, crossbreds to breed of sire
  • PTA changes more in breeds with fewer animals