Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
New Genomic Predictions
Combine DNA and DHIA Data
2
Traditional Pedigree
3
Genomic Pedigree
4
Example of SNP Haplotypes
5
SNP Pedigree
6
Haplotype Pedigree
7
Haplotypes Sum to Genotypes
8
Genotype Pedigree
Count number of second allele
9
How Related are Relatives?
  • Example: Full sibs
    • are expected to share 50% of their DNA on average, with SD of 5%
    • may actually share 40% to 60% of their DNA because each inherits a different mixture of chromosome segments from the two parents.
  • Combine genotype and pedigree data to determine exact fractions
10
Measuring Genetic Similarity
  • Cattle genome sequenced in 2004
    • 30 chromosome pairs (including X,Y)
    • 3 billion letters from each parent
  • Illumina Bovine SNP50TM Chip
    • 58,000 genetic markers in 2007
    • 39,835 used in genomic predictions
    • Cost about $200 per animal
11
Genotyped Bulls
from Cooperative Dairy DNA Repository
  • DNA of bulls stored in Beltsville (BFGL)
  • Genotypes of 2560 proven bulls included in computing predictions
    • Bulls born 1994-1996 with >75% reliability of Net Merit
    • Plus ancestor bulls born 1952-1993
  • Genotypes of 659 later bulls used to test predictions
    • Born 2001 with >75% reliability of Net Merit
12
Contributors of DNA
CDDR bulls to predict born in 2001
13
Birth Years of Bulls Genotyped
14
Simulated Results
Actual pedigrees and 10,000 SNPs
  • Normally distributed QTLs, n = 100
  • Reliability vs parent average REL
    • 58% vs 36% if QTLs are between SNPs
    • 71% vs 36% if QTLs are located at SNPs
    • Higher REL if major loci and Bayesian methods used, lower if many loci (>100) affect trait
15
Actual Results
  • Predict January 2008 daughter deviations for 569 younger bulls from August 2003 PTAs for 2650 older bulls


  • Results computed for 5 yield traits, 5 health traits, 16 conformation traits, and Net Merit
16
Reliabilities and R-square values comparing traditional to genomic predictions
17
Reliabilities and R-square values comparing traditional to genomic predictions
18
Conclusions
  • Genomic predictions significantly better than parent average (P < .0001) for all 26 traits tested
  • Gains in reliability equivalent on average to 9 daughters with records